Snugpak All Weather Shelter G1 vs G2: A Detailed Comparison

Choosing between the Snugpak All Weather Shelter G1 and G2 can be challenging. Both models offer reliable weather protection, but key differences in construction and design impact durability and longevity. This detailed comparison analyzes the specific features of each shelter, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses. We'll examine the stitching, webbing, attachment points, and overall build quality to determine which model offers the superior performance and value for your needs. Whether you're a seasoned outdoors enthusiast or a casual camper, understanding these differences will help you select the shelter that best suits your requirements and budget.This in-depth review focuses on a point-by-point comparison of the G1 and G2 models, covering crucial aspects like seam construction, webbing reinforcement, and ridgeline attachment. We'll explore the impact of design choices on the overall strength and resilience of each shelter, especially in demanding conditions. By the end of this comparison, you'll have a clear understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of both the G1 and G2, allowing for an informed decision based on your individual priorities and anticipated usage.

Read more: 5 Best PVC Camping Tarps for Your Next Adventure

Corner Construction and Durability

The G1 features a simple, yet strong, single-line stitch along the main seam with double stitching reinforcing the corners. The webbing is looped over and back on itself, providing a secure attachment point. The inclusion of plastic multi-tabs further enhances its durability.

Close-up of G1 corner showing stitching and webbing.
Close-up of G1 corner showing stitching and webbing.

In contrast, the G2 showcases a reinforced corner with an additional layer of material for increased strength. The webbing uses a single tab and double stitching along the seam, terminating in a triangle point. While lacking the plastic multi-tabs, it maintains a sturdy structure. The G2's darker color also provides better camouflage.

Overlay of G1 and G2 corners highlighting the differences in construction.
Overlay of G1 and G2 corners highlighting the differences in construction.

Both versions use thick stitching for robustness. However, the extra material layering in the G2 suggests superior durability for demanding conditions.

Close-up of G2 corner showcasing reinforced material and stitching.
Close-up of G2 corner showcasing reinforced material and stitching.

Side and Wing Construction

The G1's side features heavily stitched webbing, forming a triangle with double stitching along the seam. The ‘wing’ area, where the tarp is pegged out, is also double stitched for extra strength. The addition of my plastic multi-tabs further strengthens this area.

G1 side panel detailing showing stitching and webbing configuration.
G1 side panel detailing showing stitching and webbing configuration.

The G2 maintains the double stitching on the seam and ‘wing’, but incorporates an additional triangle of material for enhanced reinforcement. The webbing is a single piece, stitched to the main fabric, and then folded to create a loop. This design prioritizes a simpler yet still robust construction.

Comparison shot of G1 and G2 side panels, highlighting the extra material on the G2.
Comparison shot of G1 and G2 side panels, highlighting the extra material on the G2.

While both designs demonstrate solid construction, the G2’s reinforced material and simplified webbing approach appears more streamlined and possibly more durable for long-term use.

Close-up on G1 and G2 wing sections, focusing on stitching differences.
Close-up on G1 and G2 wing sections, focusing on stitching differences.

Ridgeline Attachment Points

The G1's ridgeline attachment point utilizes a single plastic press-stud, webbing, and stitching. While functional, it appears less reinforced compared to the G2.

G1 ridgeline attachment point showing webbing and stitching.
G1 ridgeline attachment point showing webbing and stitching.

The G2 boasts a more substantial ridgeline attachment, featuring an extra layer of material, double stitching along seams, and a reinforced webbing point. The single stitch across the webbing to the main fabric is a simpler design than the G1.

G2 ridgeline attachment point highlighting the reinforced construction.
G2 ridgeline attachment point highlighting the reinforced construction.

The G2's design indicates a more durable and secure ridgeline attachment, minimizing the risk of tearing under stress.

Inside view of G1 and G2 ridgeline attachment points for comparison.
Inside view of G1 and G2 ridgeline attachment points for comparison.

Conclusion: G1 vs G2 – Which is Better?

The Snugpak All Weather Shelter G2 shows significant improvements in design and construction over its predecessor, the G1. While the G1 is a functional shelter, it shows areas of potential weakness where the fabric is more likely to tear under stress. The G2 addresses these concerns with reinforced stitching, extra layers of material in key stress points, and a simplified yet more durable webbing configuration.

The G2’s darker color provides superior camouflage. The omission of the plastic press-studs, though a drawback for some, allows for more versatile configurations and storage. Ultimately, the improved durability and refined design of the G2 make it the superior choice, justifying a higher price point.

For users seeking a robust, long-lasting, and adaptable shelter, the G2 is the clear winner. Although the G1 has served some well, the upgrades in the G2 make it a more reliable and practical option overall.