This review delves into the Klymit Static V Ultralight Insulated sleeping pad, evaluating its performance and value against the popular Thermarest Xlite. We examine key features including weight, price, inflation/deflation ease, comfort, and noise levels. The Klymit boasts a significantly lower price point, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious backpackers. However, it's crucial to understand the trade-offs involved compared to a higher-end model like the Xlite. This review provides a comprehensive comparison, highlighting where the Klymit excels and where it falls short.Ultimately, this review aims to help you decide if the Klymit Static V is the right sleeping pad for your backpacking needs. We weigh the pros and cons – its lighter weight than expected considering the price, ease of inflation (though requiring more effort), and surprisingly quiet nature – against potential drawbacks like less adjustability and potentially more challenging deflation. Whether the Klymit's budget-friendly approach outweighs the compromises is a question this review seeks to answer definitively.
Read more: Thermarest vs Sea to Summit Winter Sleeping Pads: A Detailed Comparison
Weight and Packability
The Klymit Static V Ultralight Insulated sleeping pad weighs in at 16.9 oz (my scale), or 17.9 oz with the stuff sack. This is heavier than the Thermarest Xlite, but still comfortably within the realm of lightweight backpacking. The added weight is justifiable considering the significantly lower price point and increased insulation.
Comparing it to my well-used Thermarest Xlite (12.6 oz), the difference isn't drastic, making it a viable option even for ultralight backpacking enthusiasts. The included stuff sack adds a negligible amount to the overall weight.
Price Comparison: Value for Money
The Klymit Static V Ultralight Insulated retails for around $60 on Massdrop, a steal compared to the Thermarest Xlite, which typically costs around $160. While not identical in performance, the price difference is substantial, making the Klymit an exceptionally budget-friendly option.
Considering the performance for the price, the Klymit offers an incredible value proposition. Backpackers on a budget or those looking for a reliable backup pad will appreciate this significantly lower cost.
Inflation and Deflation
Inflation is quicker with the Klymit (8 breaths vs 14 for the Xlite), but requires more effort due to its baffle design. The interconnected chambers of the Xlite make inflation smoother, while the Klymit’s design presents more resistance.
Deflation is also more challenging with the Klymit, taking more time and effort to fully compress. This could be a drawback for those prioritizing quick packing in the mornings.
Comfort and Adjustability
While comfortable, the Klymit lacks the adjustability of the Xlite. The Xlite allows for fine-tuning firmness, whereas the Klymit needs to be fully inflated to prevent bottoming out. Heavier individuals may experience bottoming out on pressure points.
The Xlite’s superior adjustability offers a more customizable and comfortable sleep experience. The Klymit, while comfortable for many, may not be as suitable for heavier users.
Noise Comparison
Surprisingly, the Klymit proved quieter and less crinkly than the Xlite. This is a significant advantage for light sleepers sensitive to noise.
The reduction in noise from the Klymit is unexpected but welcome, making it a better choice for those easily disturbed by rustling sounds during sleep.
Overall Conclusion
The Klymit Static V Ultralight Insulated offers exceptional value at $60, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious backpackers. While not surpassing the Xlite in every aspect, its performance and price make it a strong contender.
Consider the Klymit if budget is a major concern or if you need a reliable, versatile four-season pad without breaking the bank. The Thermarest Xlite remains superior in adjustability and possibly long-term durability, but the Klymit is a highly competitive alternative.