This article reviews a budget-friendly ultralight backpacking shelter system weighing under two pounds. The system combines the Korea Outdoors Breezy Mesh Bivvy and the Light Outdoors SIL Poly tarp, offering a compelling alternative to expensive high-end options. The author details their experience setting up and using both components, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each. Expect an in-depth look at the practicality, performance, and cost-effectiveness of this lightweight setup, perfect for budget-conscious adventurers seeking to minimize their pack weight.This review explores the balance between weight savings and affordability in ultralight backpacking. The author focuses on the ease of use, weather protection, and overall functionality of the bivy and tarp system. Specific considerations regarding ventilation, durability, and setup challenges are addressed, providing a realistic assessment of this affordable solution. Whether you're a seasoned ultralight backpacker or just starting out, this review offers valuable insight into creating a functional and lightweight shelter without breaking the bank.
Pros And Cons
- Lightweight (around 10-11 ounces)
- Large bathtub floor
- High sidewalls for ample space
- Mesh back wall for ventilation
- Waterproof coating on sidewalls
- Affordable (around $59-$69)
- Entrance from the top only
- Requires additional setup and practice for optimal tautness
- Lightweight (around 10-11 ounces)
- Versatile, can be configured for different weather conditions
- Affordable (around $84)
- Requires additional setup and stakes to secure it properly
- Can sag if not properly setup
Read more: 5 Best PVC Camping Tarps for Your Next Adventure
The Korea Outdoors Breezy Mesh Bivvy
My quest for an ultralight backpacking shelter led me to the Korea Outdoors Breezy Mesh Bivvy. This mesh bivy is designed for ventilation and lightweight backpacking. The unique design features sidewalls and a bathtub floor for added weather protection. It's surprisingly spacious inside considering its weight.
Initial setup was a little tricky right out of the box, but I expect this will improve with more use. The mesh walls provide excellent ventilation, crucial for warmer climates. The sidewalls offer a good level of protection from the elements.
The bivy itself is surprisingly roomy. I envision using trekking poles for added structure and stability. It packs down small and light, an important consideration for ultralight backpacking.
The Light Outdoors SIL Poly Tarp
To complete my ultralight shelter system, I paired the bivy with the Light Outdoors SIL Poly tarp. This 8.5x10ft tarp provides ample coverage. It's incredibly lightweight, weighing in around 10-11 ounces.
I chose the SIL poly material for its balance of durability and weight. I've seen several reviews about lighter Dyneema options, but the cost is significantly higher. The initial setup of the tarp had some sags, indicating I could benefit from more practice.
The tarp's versatility is a major plus. It can be configured in numerous ways depending on weather conditions and personal preferences. With practice, I could pitch it more taut, making it even more effective in rainy conditions.
Combined Setup and Considerations
Together, the bivy and tarp create a surprisingly effective shelter system. The combined weight is well under two pounds, achieving my ultralight goal. The setup allows for excellent ventilation while offering protection from rain and wind.
I'm considering using Dyneema cord for even lighter weight and potentially a footprint for additional ground protection. While this setup works well, there's room for improvement; a more secure tarp setup is needed.
The cost-effectiveness is significant compared to high-end ultralight options. This system offers a solid balance between weight savings and affordability.
Conclusion and Overall Assessment
This inexpensive tarp and bivy setup provides a compelling option for ultralight backpacking enthusiasts on a budget. The Korea Outdoors Breezy Mesh Bivvy and the Light Outdoors SIL Poly Tarp offer significant weight savings without sacrificing too much in terms of protection.
While the initial setup required some practice, the combined system offers good ventilation, weather resistance, and surprising spaciousness. The total cost is significantly less than high-end Dyneema options.
Ultimately, the decision of whether this setup suits your needs depends on your individual priorities. If you value affordability and a good balance of weight and protection, this system is definitely worth considering. For those seeking the absolute lightest weight possible, Dyneema options might be a better choice, despite the significant increase in cost.
